Also discussed here: cable 06GUANGZHOU27482, WAITING TO INHALE: THE STATE OF AIR POLLUTION IN (Wikileaks, Aug. 23, 2011)
Today’s focus is on a report provided by Wikileaks from the US foreign service in 2006 about the reluctance of Chinese officials to report or release urban air pollution data. There is some irony here of course in the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases criticizing #2. As well, there seems to be a tendency of those responsible for air quality, particularly in the USA and Canada, of refusing to monitor or report on roadside roadside emissions in traffic-clogged cities, seen as one of the main factors for urban air pollution and its health impacts (as demonstrated in hundreds of reviews on this blog). There are exceptions, of course: New York City Community Air Survey and
Managing Hot Spots in Urban Municipalities in England (UK Local Air Quality Management Agreements directed by DEFRA)
Key Quotes:
“Hong Kong officials have publicly acknowledged the importance of monitoring PM2.5 in the index, but they concede that including a pollutant whose current levels are so far above acceptable standards – a situation that is not likely to improve any time soon -- would be politically difficult”
“ PM2.5 levels in Guangdong are typically 5-10 times higher than the suggested WHO guideline levels, and 2-3 times higher than even the first-tier interim WHO targets”
“PM2.5 is not on the government index of air pollutants yet it is deemed to be of highest concern for public health because the particles are so fine they can enter into the lungs, contribute to acute respiratory symptoms, heart disease, childhood illnesses and premature deaths”
"Academics and research scientists in Guangdong, who are increasingly concerned about the region's serious air pollution, but feel pressured to tone down their comments lest they face cuts in research funding ... Scientists acknowledge that lack of transparency for existing air pollution data is a major problem both for research and policy making."
“Since the cable was written in November 2006, however, environmentalists have commended the progress that China has made in measuring, disclosing and reducing air pollution, but many of these concerns remain today”
Related articles
- LA Ranks Number One For Dirty Air (fitsugar.com)
- London ranks among worst European cities for air pollution (guardian.co.uk)
- Increased Cancer Risk in These Polluted Cities (fitsugar.com)
- Exercise and Exhaust: A Bad Combination (fitsugar.com)
- Letters: Obama Blocks an Air Pollution Rule (nytimes.com)
- Iqaluit to have hourly air-quality checks in 2012 (cbc.ca)
- Ozone Al on ozone (junkscience.com)
- Ambient Air Pollution in Canada and Environmental Pricing (pollutionfree.wordpress.com)
- Divisive Pollution Rule Remains on Schedule (newdayunderwriting.wordpress.com)
- Back to School: Some Fairbanks schools get an 'F' in air quality (alaskaconservationblog.com)
- One mosquito coil equals 100 cigarettes, says expert (news.bioscholar.com)
- How much pollution does china make every year (wiki.answers.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment