Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Urban Traffic Hotspots of Greenhouse Gas Concentrations

Cities, traffic, and CO2: A multidecadal assessment of trends, drivers, and scaling relationships (6 page pdf, Conor K. Gately, Lucy R. Hutyra, and Ian Sue Wing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS), Apr. 9, 2015)

Also discussed here: Maps pinpoint where cars pollute the most (Barbara Moran-Boston University, Futurity, Apr. 15, 2015)

Today we review research into the contributions that vehicles make to greenhouse gas emissions over the last 33 years on urban roads in the USA where 87% of the counties have low population densities (or are sprawled towns and cities). Results indicate that top-down estimates of national or regional GHG emissions may be as much as 50% in error unless these emissions are estimated at the scale of roads and streets (approx 1 km resolution) as opposed to estimating them from population only. The authors suggest that the contributions from on-road emissions will likely increase as population and road densities increase in the future, suggesting that carbon policy makers focus on per capita emissions (which in turn would be linked to low or high driving rates) to capture the greater emissions from urban hotspots.

. CO2_map_770  

Key Quotes:

“Over the past 40 years, the global urban population rose from 1.51 to 3.91 billion people, and it is expected to reach 6.3 billion people by 2050 ..CO2 emissions from transportation comprised 23% of global fossil fuel carbon emissions in 2010 ..with over 40% of those emissions produced by road travel in urban areas”

“The United States, with 5% of the world’s population and 30% of the world’s automobiles, emits 45% of global transportation CO2 emissions…Nationally, the on-road sector represented 28% of total fossil fuel CO2 emissions in 2012 and is responsible for almost half of the growth in total US emissions since 1990..urban areas are responsible for 80% of on-road emissions growth since 1980 and for 63% of total 2012 emissions”

“before the peak in 2004, urban per capita emissions rose 19% from 1980 levels, whereas average urban population density rose 30% over the same time period. This discrepancy suggests that the future trajectory of per capita on-road emissions may not be as strongly coupled with trends in urban densification as previously believed.”

“only 46 counties (comprising 13% of the US population) had a population density greater than 1,000 persons per square kilometer. For the remaining 87% of the US population that lives in lower density counties, our results indicate that the ongoing urban growth in these counties is likely to produce substantial increases in local on-road emissions, because the reductions in per capita emissions at lower levels of urban density will not be sufficient to stabilize the total emissions growth.”

“Cars are the hardest part of the emissions equation to quantify…They are moving all the time at different speeds, and there are different cars on the road at different times of day.”

“DARTE [Database of Road Transportation Emissions ] complements NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2, which is collecting global data on atmospheric carbon dioxide…We need good bottom-up data to match what we’re measuring looking down from space. That’s what we need to really advance greenhouse gas polices.”

“it may make more sense for policy makers to focus on reducing local per capita emissions, rather than total emissions, because most growing urban areas should expect total on-road emissions to continue to rise with the population over the next decades.”

“Uncertainty in the magnitude of on-road emissions at the national level is estimated to be on the order of 3–5% for developed countries…but at subnational or state scales, existing inventories disagree by as much as 40%... and at city scales, uncertainty can be as large as 50–100%”

“Traffic sensors are widely considered to measure total vehicle volumes with 95–99% accuracy” “Our results highlight the importance of cities as sources of CO2 and the need for improved fine-scale inventories for monitoring and reporting of emissions.”

Thursday, July 2, 2015

What are the Provinces Doing to Decarbonize Canada’s Energy Systems?

Se below
Se below (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 Today we review a report from the Pembina Institute which examined the roles provinces play and could play in reducing greenhouse gas emissions to meet national goals, a Canadian Energy Strategy – the main item discussed at a meeting Canadian premiers in Quebec City. While three provinces (Ontario, Quebec and BC) have made modest reductions of 19, 9 and 3% from 2005, Alberta now produces more than Quebec and Ontario combined with a failed cap and trade system that applies to less than 50% of its emissions at a price ($1.80 per tonne) that has little impact on decisions made by industry to reduce carbon fuel use. The plans for the Alberta oil sands and proposals to expand pipeline capacity to the east coast (by 1.1 mbpd) contribute to concerns to keep 2/3’s of the earth’s carbon reserves in the ground if the objective of limiting climate warming to less than 2 degrees C- which means that the oil sands production bust be limited by 3.3 mbpd. Restoration of a committee to advise the federal government on a Canada Energy Strategy is recommended, similar to the long standing one that was eliminated by the present government (the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy or NTREE)  
  

Key Quotes: 

“Between 2005 and 2012, only Alberta’s and Saskatchewan’s emissions profiles worsened in absolute terms…Alberta’s at a rate of 7% above 2005 levels, and Saskatchewan at a rate of 5% above 2005 levels” 

“Ontario (19% below 2005) …Green Energy Act have contributed to the province achieving a 19% reduction below 2005 emissions levels.. phase out of coal-fired power and the successful implementation of the Green Energy Act” 

“Quebec (9% below 2005)… has reduced its emissions by 6.8% below its 1990 levels… Quebec’s 2012 emissions were 9% below its 2005 levels.. Quebec remains a strong member of the Western Climate Initiative, North America’s first and largest cap-and-trade system” 

“British Columbia (3% below 2005)… the carbon tax, clean energy requirements and the low-carbon fuel standard have enabled the province to meet its 2012 interim target to cut carbon pollution. In 2012, B.C. had reduced its emissions inventory by 3% relative to the province’s 2005 emissions levels” 

“Alberta now produces more greenhouse gas emissions than Ontario and Quebec … Alberta’s rules apply to approximately 50% of the province's total emissions; facilities with less than100,000 tonnes of emissions per year are exempt… The effective carbon price .. is therefore well below $15 per tonne — for companies regulated by the policy, it works out to just $1.80 per tonne of emissions released.” 

 “Because of the Energy East pipeline’s proposed capacity of 1.1 mbpd, it could play a significant role in determining how much and how fast the oil sands sector expands…crude by rail will provide less than one-quarter of the oil sands industry’s total transportation requirement in the next 12 to 16 months” 

“to ensure the planet has a 50% chance of limiting atmospheric warming to 2°C — two-thirds of the earth’s known oil, gas, and coal reserves must remain unburned between now and 2050. Tracing this back to production in Alberta’s oil sands, the IEA had modeled scenarios that include up to 3.3 mbpd of oil sands production.” 

“Create a climate and energy advisory committee within the Canadian Energy Strategy…This committee would advise the premiers on the optimal path forward as they work to decarbonize their energy systems while growing their economies.”

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

How does Traffic-Related Air Pollution Affect Babies’ Brains?

Category:Educational research
Category:Educational research (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Prenatal and Childhood Traffic-Related Pollution Exposure and Childhood Cognition in the Project Viva Cohort (31 page pdf, Maria H. Harris, Diane R. Gold, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Steven J. Melly, Antonella Zanobetti, Brent A. Coull, Joel D. Schwartz, Alexandros Gryparis, Itai Kloog, Petros Koutrakis, David C. Bellinger, Roberta F. White, Sharon K. Sagiv, and Emily Oken, Environmental Health Perspectives, Apr. 3, 2015)

Today we review the impact of traffic- related air pollution (which includes tire wear particles and dust, as well as noise and tail pipe emissions) on the thinking or cognitive abilities of babies. Results indicate lower IQs (by 7.5 points) –both verbal and non-verbal- for children who, at birth, were living less than 50 m from heavy traffic. It also indicates that exposure during gestation or early childhood is more important than proximity to pollution later in childhood.

Key Quotes:

“We examined associations of child cognitive outcomes with exposure to traffic-related air pollutants in late pregnancy and childhood.”

 “Compared to children living ≥200 m from a major roadway at birth, those living <50 m away had lower non-verbal IQ”

“non -verbal IQ scores were also lower among children living <50 m versus ≥ 200 m from a major roadway at the time of cognitive testing” “there was no evidence of adverse association between third trimester PM2.5 and cognitive outcomes”

“Prenatal and childhood exposure to traffic density and PM2.5 did not appear associated with poorer cognitive peeformance”

“These findings suggest that major roadway proximity during gestation and early life might have a greater influence on cognitive development than major roadway proximity later in childhood”

“Air pollution exposure could impair neurodevelopment through several pathways, including endocrine disruption, epigenetic changes, or systemic inflammatory responses leading to oxidative stress.. There is also evidence that chronic exposure to noise may be associated with decreased cognitive function in children”

Thursday, June 25, 2015

How Does Air Pollution affect the Blood Pressure of Babies in the Womb?

Air Pollution and Neonatal Blood Pressure (1 page pdf, Lenie van Rossem, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Steven J. Melly, Itai Kloog, Heike Luttmann-Gibson, Antonella Zanobetti, Brent A. Coull, Joel D. Schwartz, Murray A. Mittleman, Emily Oken, Matthew W. Gillman, Petros Koutrakis, and Diane R. Gold, Environmental Health Perspectives, Apr. 3, 2015)

Today we review research into the impact of air pollutants- both particulate and gaseous- on prenatal blood pressure. Results indicate that particulates (PM2.5) and black carbon do increase systolic blood pressure in the 3rd trimester but not in the second when gaseous pollutants such as Co or NO2 tend to lower it, suggesting different ways that gas or particulate pollution affect the fetus. It is not known if this impact has lasting effects on the baby’s health in later life

 . baby bp  

Key Quotes:

“The study considered potential effects of several air pollutants, including PM2.5, BC (a traffic-related component of particulate pollution), nitrogen oxides, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and carbon monoxide”

“The most striking and significant findings are the third-trimester associations between pollutants and newborn blood pressure,”

“increased ozone exposure in the third trimester was associated with lower systolic blood pressure in newborns, whereas exposure in the second trimester was associated with higher blood pressure. Increased estimated exposures to carbon monoxide or nitrogen oxides during the second trimester also were associated with lower newborn systolic blood pressure. One possible explanation for these results is that gaseous pollutants such as ozone, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide may affect blood pressure through a different biological pathway than particulate pollutants."

“I was interested, though not entirely surprised, to find that higher shorter-term as well as ninety-day averaged pollution was associated with higher newborn blood pressure,”

“We just don’t know what an increase in blood pressure of a few mmHg means, if anything, in a newborn… It could indicate that infants are “programmed” before birth to have higher blood pressure later in life…or it could be a short-term effect that lasts only a few days or months after birth, then goes away with no further consequence. Follow-up later in life is needed to determine how the observed associations play out over time.”

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

What are the Characteristics of Traffic Congestion?

Traffic Scorecard (INRIX) Also discussed here: The 100 most congested cities in Europe and North America (The Guardian, Jul. 7, 2014)

And here: Economic & Environmental Impact of Traffic Congestion in Europe & the US (INRIX)

And here: Annual Cost of Gridlock in Europe and the US will Increase 50 Percent on Average to $293 Billion by 2030 (INRIX Press Release, Oct. 14, 2014)

And here: Key Findings (INRIX, 2013)

Today we review an analysis of traffic congestion in Europe and US/Canada carried out by INRIX which reveal a number of interesting trends and characteristics as well as a ranking of countries and cities where it is worse. Although many assume Canada and the USA are similar in many respects, in traffic congestion (and often in hockey) Canada is #1 as a country although its two of its biggest cities are #4 (Montreal) and # 10 (Toronto) – which means that its medium sized cities are likely more congested than their American counterparts. Traffic is highest during week-day rush hours but who knew that Tuesday morning and Friday afternoon were the worst? While Belgium’s congestion is the worst in Europe (followed by the UK, Holland and Italy) and North America, Milano, Italy tops the list as the most congested city (followed by Honolulu, London and Los Angeles). And, unchecked, it will get worse. Congestion cost individual drivers, on average, $1, 740 each year and this is predicted to more than double by 2030 to $2,902. Managing the flow of traffic in real-time is helped by the 80% of vehicles that will be able to monitor and manage traffic conditions by onboard GPS technology. This also suggests (to this reviewer at least) that an opportunity exists to apply real-time congestion charging as well to reduce peak flows and associated traffic-related air pollution.

  congestion by hour  

Key Quotes:

“The Inrix traffic-data company has raided its archives to calculate the most congested cities in Europe and North America, as well as the total number of hours wasted in traffic. Inrix looked at its records of real-time traffic on every road segment during peak hours (6am-10am and 3pm-7pm, Monday through Friday) to see how the actual speed every 15 minutes related to how fast traffic would have been if the road were free-flowing”

“The combined annual cost of gridlock to these countries [USA, UK, France, Germany] is expected to soar to $293.1 billion by 2030, almost a 50% increase from 2013” “At the individual level, traffic congestion cost drivers $1,740 last year on average across the four countries. If unchecked, this number is expected to grow more than 60% to $2,902 annually by 2030”

“The overall economic impact is greatest in the U.S. where the estimated cumulative cost of traffic congestion by 2030 is $2.8 trillion – the same amount Americans collectively paid in U.S. taxes last year….However the UK (at 66%) and London (at 71%) will see the greatest annual rise in the cost of congestion by 2030, mainly as a result of seeing the highest increase in urbanization”

“Future roads will not be built with concrete as much as they’ll be built with software. It’s time to apply what we’ve learned from building the Internet highway to build a smarter transportation networks. .. 80 percent of cars on the road in the U.S. and Western Europe will be connected and a source of real‐time data by 2017… we have a unique opportunity to manage the flow of people and commerce as efficiently as we direct the flow of data over our IT networks today”

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Why (most) Politicians Do Not Act on Climate Change?

Mean surface temperature change for 1999–2008 ...
Mean surface temperature change for 1999–2008 relative to the average temperatures from 1940 to 1980 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


Key Quotes: 

“the key to engaging the debate is addressing the deeper ideological, cultural, and social filters that are triggered by this issue.” 

“These conversations have become a rhetorical contest, one where opposing sides try to achieve victory through playing on fear, distrust, and intolerance. At its heart, this split no longer concerns carbon dioxide, greenhouse gases, or climate modeling; rather, it is the product of contrasting, deeply entrenched worldviews.” 

“While physical scientists explore the mechanics and implications of a changing climate, the social scientist explores the cultural and cognitive reasons why people support or reject their conclusions” 

“scientists tried to explain that the issue over climate change is about global temperature increases, not regional weather deviations, and that one weather event does not prove or disprove the science…the odds are that we can expect as a result of global warming to see more of this pattern of extreme cold in the mid-latitudes and some extreme warm in the far north” [concerning the 2014 Polar Vortex] 

“Physical scientists are mystified and frustrated by this state of affairs. But it makes sense to social scientists from disciplines like psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science, ethics, and philosophy, who offer valuable tools, first for understanding why people take such polarized views on controversial issues and then for moving beyond the rancor” 

“Four points that have to be addressed: 
• there is a vast physical infrastructure around fossil fuels and the lifestyle they create, which cannot be replaced easily. 
• there are strong economic and political interests that are threatened by the issue of climate change …As a result, they have adopted strategies to confuse and polarize the debate in order to protect their interests. 
• Efforts to change cultural views on climate change must include changing the vast institutions and infrastructure of our economy and 
• be prepared to deal with resistance from those who benefit from them”

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

How Does Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter Cause Anxiety in Older Women?

High Anxiety
High Anxiety (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The relation between past exposure to fine particulate air pollution and prevalent anxiety: observational cohort study (9 page pdf, Melinda C Power, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Jaime E Hart, Olivia I Okereke, Francine Laden, Marc G Weisskopf, British Medical Journal, Mar. 24, 2015) 

Also discussed here: Air pollution may be related to anxiety levels in women: study (Kathryn Doyle, Toronto Globe and Mail, Apr. 1, 2015) 


Today we review research into the impact of exposure to PM2.5 had on anxiety for a large group of older women (mean age 70) over various periods of exposure. Anxiety disorders affect 16% of people worldwide over their lives and 11% have suffered from it in the last year. Results indicate a clear link with 12% more of those exposed to fine particulates showing high anxiety symptoms than those who were not so exposed. Also those who live between 50 and 200 m of busy roadways with traffic-related air pollution were more likely to show these symptoms than those who live farther away. Exposure to larger sized particulates (such as PM10) and exposure within 50 m of roadways did not show greater anxiety symptoms. Because of the people sampled in this study, it is not possible to extend these results to younger women or to men although there is evidence of pollution-stress links for the latter group.


Key Quotes: 

“Globally, approximately 16% of people will have an anxiety disorder in their lifetime and 11% will have experienced an anxiety disorder in the past year…In 2010, anxiety disorders accounted for approximately 26.8 million disability adjusted life years worldwide”

“Women have a higher prevalence of anxiety disorders than men and the onset for most anxiety disorders is commonly in adolescence or young adulthood.” 

 “Among the nurses who responded to the questionnaire, 15% experienced high levels of the following symptoms:
  • Fearfulness
  • Desire for avoidance
  • Tendency to worry.”
“women who were exposed to the most small particles in the air one month before their anxiety test were about 12 per cent more likely to have high anxiety symptoms than those not exposed to these particles one month previously.”

"Nurses who lived 50 to 200 m from the nearest major road were more likely to have increased Crown-Crisp index phobic anxiety scale scores than those living >200 m away”

“Our data support an association between exposure to particulate matter of <2.5 ÎĽm in diameter (PM2.5) but not 2.5 to 10 ÎĽm in diameter (PM2.5–10) or proximity to roadways, and high symptoms of anxiety. The association between PM2.5 and high anxiety seems primarily driven by a relation with shorter term average exposures to PM2.5”

“it is possible that reductions in exposure to PM2.5, through changes to regulations or individual behavior, may help reduce anxiety symptoms”

"Since air pollution causes systemic inflammation, it is reasonable that researchers have now turned to the arena of mental health, a leading priority for research given the relative absence of known modifiable risk factors and a high and growing disease burden,"